top of page

PLAB 2 Mock Test Feedback :: Night Terrors :: Paediatrics

Mock Date: 02/04/2025

Action Items:

  • Practice and Review the case in the OSCE workbench: Click Here

  • Read the Mock Feedback Blog:  Click Here

  • Additional Resources: Click Here

  • Deep Dive into your performance below:




Scenario Summary:

You are an FY2 doctor in a GP surgery. Your patient is Margo Stone, a 30-year-old mother who is concerned about her 5-year-old son, Mason, who has been waking up in the middle of the night screaming for the past 4 months. Mason's father had similar episodes in childhood. Margo is worried and wants to know if Mason is having nightmares or if there is something serious going on.


My Performance:

🔍Let’s Deep Dive into your performance:

The Domain-wise evaluation shows areas where you did well and others where you have room to grow. 

  • A "Yes" means you covered that point effectively

  • A "Partial" indicates that you did some of it well but missed some key details. 

  • A "No" means there was an important opportunity that wasn’t addressed.

Don’t worry if you see several areas marked "No" or "Partial"—this is common and simply highlights where you can focus your learning. 

By reflecting on these areas and practicing, you’ll be able to improve and feel more confident in your consultations. Remember, every bit of feedback is an opportunity to grow, and you’re on the right path by taking these steps.


Timestamps are provided to show exactly when during the consultation you covered or missed key points. Reviewing these can help you see how well you're managing your time and where you might need to be more efficient in addressing important areas.

Domain

Point

Timestamp

Response

Remarks

Data Gathering

Patient identifiers: Confirm Margo Stone's full name and age

00:19

No

You asked for the patient's name and age but did not confirm the surname “Stone” or full name. Always confirm full name to avoid identity issues.

Data Gathering

Confirm the reason for the visit: Concerns about her son Mason's nocturnal episodes

00:35

Yes

You appropriately confirmed the reason for consultation early on. Well done.

Data Gathering

History of present illness: Frequency, timing, and nature of Mason's nocturnal episodes

01:29

Yes

You covered the timing (middle of the night), frequency (almost daily for 4 months), and nature (screaming). Great detailed exploration here.

Data Gathering

Ask if Mason remembers the episodes in the morning

03:41

Yes

You asked this directly and noted that Mason doesn’t remember. Good inclusion.

Data Gathering

Rule out external triggers: Scary movies, recent stressors or changes in Mason's routine

04:22

Partial

You explored routine changes and stressors but missed asking about media exposure or any frightening content. This would help rule out nightmares.

Data Gathering

Discuss family history of similar episodes, noting Mason's father's history


No

You did not ask about family history or if similar episodes have occurred in any relatives, including the father. A quick question like “Any family history of similar issues?” would’ve sufficed.

Data Gathering

Ask about current health: Any fever, infections, or other illnesses


No

You asked if he has medical conditions (03:08), but didn’t specifically ask about recent infections or illnesses which are important in ruling out organic causes.

Data Gathering

Vaccination: Confirm Mason is up to date with all vaccinations

03:16

Yes

You asked directly and got confirmation. Good.

Data Gathering

Take birth and early history: Pregnancy, delivery, feeding and development


No

You asked about developmental milestones (02:55), but not about birth history, delivery, or early feeding. This is essential for a full paediatric history.

Data Gathering

Differential Diagnosis: Rule out nightmares and infections

04:22

Partial

You ruled out stressors and mentioned a diagnosis of night terrors, but did not sufficiently rule out nightmares or infections like URTI, especially given the screaming.

Data Gathering

ICE (Ideas, Concerns, Expectations): Explore Margo's ideas, concerns, and expectations

03:36

Yes

You asked about her thoughts, concerns and expectations explicitly. Strong point.

Data Gathering

Effects of Symptoms: Discuss how Mason's episodes affect Margo's sleep and peace of mind

04:01

Yes

You explored how this has affected her work, and she expressed emotional distress multiple times.

Data Gathering

Examination: Conduct head-to-toe examination and assess developmental milestones

04:49

Partial

You said you'd examine Mason “head-to-toe” but did not clearly mention developmental milestone assessment though you asked about them in history. It’s better to explicitly mention both.

Data Gathering

Conduct thorough physical and developmental examination of Mason along with vitals

04:49

Partial

You mentioned vitals and head-to-toe check, but there’s no evidence you assessed developmentally or said what you were looking for. A line like "I’d like to assess his motor and speech milestones" would help.

Management

Reassurance and Education: Explain the provisional diagnosis as night terrors and the difference between nightmares and night terrors

05:27

Partial

You explained night terrors well, but missed clearly contrasting them with nightmares. This would help reduce confusion for the parent.

Management

Provide reassurance that these episodes are common and typically outgrown

07:27

Yes

You reassured that the condition would subside with time and management. Well done.

Management

Treatment Plan for Nightmares: Discuss stressors, ensure a relaxing bedtime routine, avoid scary media


No

You focused on night terrors, but missed discussing nightmare management, which should always be considered differentially.

Management

Treatment Plan for Night Terrors: Advise staying calm, avoid waking Mason, maintain a safe environment


No

You didn't advise on practical home management like keeping Mason safe, not waking him, or staying calm during episodes. These are vital.

Management

Follow-Up: Schedule a follow-up appointment in 2 months to review progress


No

You didn’t mention any follow-up plan. Always offer a timeframe for review—2 months is reasonable.

Management

Provide a leaflet with information about managing nightmares and night terrors

06:56

Yes

You mentioned giving a leaflet. Great job.

Management

Safety Netting: Advise to seek help if new symptoms develop (e.g., daytime changes, injury, breathing problems)


No

You did not mention red flags or when to return. Include signs like daytime confusion, injury during episode, etc.

Interpersonal Skills

Effective Communication: Use empathetic and clear language to explain the condition

01:00, 05:27

Partial

You were warm and clear but used some rehearsed lines. To score higher, avoid repetitive stock phrases like “we will find a solution”.

Interpersonal Skills

Validate Margo’s concerns and provide supportive advice

00:58, 04:22

Yes

You frequently acknowledged her distress. Very compassionate approach.

Interpersonal Skills

Patient-Centered Approach: Encourage Margo to share her observations and feelings

00:40, 03:41

Yes

You created a space for her to express herself, and you responded appropriately.

Interpersonal Skills

Involve Margo in the management plan and discuss any concerns she might have

07:39

Partial

You mentioned referring to seniors and support groups, but did not explore what she'd prefer in the plan or if she was happy with it.

Interpersonal Skills

Summarize and Clarify: Summarize the discussion, ensuring Margo understands the management plan


No

You didn’t summarise the discussion or check her understanding. This would’ve been a strong close.

Interpersonal Skills

Invite any further questions and provide comprehensive answers

07:42

Partial

You answered her questions when she asked, but you didn’t actively invite them or ask “any other concerns?” which is standard good practice.


Feedback Statement Checklist


Feedback Statements:

Needs Improvement

Consultation

Disorganised structure: missed several essential data gathering items.

✔️

Diagnosis

Differential diagnosis not explored.

✔️

Examination

Developmental milestones not addressed thoroughly.

✔️

Findings



Issues

Did not explore differentials clearly or identify the main management priorities.

✔️

Management

Several core elements of management plan were missing.

✔️

Rapport



Listening



Language



Time

Missed time to deliver key elements like safety netting and follow-up.

✔️


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page