PLAB 2 Mock Test Feedback :: Barrett's Oesophagus :: Counseling
- examiner mla
- Nov 14, 2024
- 5 min read
Updated: Nov 21, 2024
Mock Date: 20/11/2024
Action Items:
Practice and Review the case in the OSCE workbench: Click Here
Read the Mock Feedback Blog: Click Here
Additional Resources: Click Here
Deep Dive into your (Private) performance below
Scenario Summary:
You are an FY2 doctor in the outpatient department. Your patient, James Clark, is a 53-year-old man with a history of GERD who recently had an endoscopy with a biopsy. He is here to discuss his biopsy results and management plan.
My Performance:
🔍Let’s Deep Dive into your performance:
The Domain-wise evaluation shows areas where you did well and others where you have room to grow.
A "Yes" means you covered that point effectively
A "Partial" indicates that you did some of it well but missed some key details.
A "No" means there was an important opportunity that wasn’t addressed.
Don’t worry if you see several areas marked "No" or "Partial"—this is common and simply highlights where you can focus your learning.
By reflecting on these areas and practicing, you’ll be able to improve and feel more confident in your consultations. Remember, every bit of feedback is an opportunity to grow, and you’re on the right path by taking these steps.
Timestamps are provided to show exactly when during the consultation you covered or missed key points. Reviewing these can help you see how well you're managing your time and where you might need to be more efficient in addressing important areas.
Domain | Point | Timestamp | Response | Remarks |
Data Gathering | Establish rapport: Greet the patient warmly and confirm identity | 00:06-00:14 | Yes | You greeted the patient by name and confirmed their identity effectively. This set a warm tone for the consultation. Great start! |
Data Gathering | Inquire about the duration and severity of GERD symptoms | 00:30-01:05 | Yes | You elicited a clear timeline of the patient's symptoms and their severity, which helped establish the history comprehensively. Well done! |
Data Gathering | Ask about compliance with omeprazole and any side effects | 02:02-02:26 | Partial | While you explored the lack of efficacy of Omeprazole, you missed asking explicitly about compliance or potential side effects. For next time, ensure you inquire if the patient has been taking the medication as prescribed. |
Data Gathering | Discuss lifestyle factors: smoking, alcohol consumption, diet, and occupation | 06:31-06:47 | Partial | You addressed the patient’s diet and occupation but did not ask about smoking or alcohol consumption. Including these factors would provide a fuller picture of the lifestyle influences on GERD. |
Data Gathering | Explore the nature of nighttime symptoms and their impact on sleep and daily life | 01:22-01:44 | Yes | You gathered detailed information about how the symptoms affect the patient’s sleep and daily functioning, which is essential for tailoring management. |
Data Gathering | Ask about any other symptoms, such as weight loss, difficulty swallowing, or pain | N/A | No | You did not inquire about potential red-flag symptoms like weight loss or difficulty swallowing. For completeness, always screen for associated symptoms that might indicate complications or alternative diagnoses. |
Management | Explain endoscopy results: Barrett’s esophagus, no dysplasia or neoplasia | 02:33-03:48 | Yes | You explained the results in understandable terms, highlighting key findings and implications. Excellent job breaking down medical jargon! |
Management | Discuss the need for regular endoscopies every 3 years | 03:58-05:10 | Partial | You mentioned the importance of follow-up endoscopies but did not fully address the patient’s reluctance or provide alternative solutions like sedation during the procedure. |
Management | Advise on lifestyle modifications: quit smoking, reduce alcohol, healthy diet | 06:48-07:02 | Partial | You discussed dietary changes but did not advise on smoking or alcohol reduction. Aim to provide a comprehensive lifestyle advice plan in future encounters. |
Management | Review medication: effectiveness and adherence to omeprazole | 02:02-02:26 | Partial | While you addressed the need for a stronger medication, you didn’t explicitly review adherence or explore if dose adjustment had been tried. |
Management | Provide written information: leaflets about Barrett’s esophagus and lifestyle changes | N/A | No | You didn’t offer written information or resources. Next time, bring up the availability of patient leaflets to reinforce your advice. |
Management | Safety netting: Emphasize importance of follow-up and early detection | 07:34-08:01 | Partial | You suggested follow-up but didn’t emphasize the critical role of early detection in managing Barrett’s esophagus. Consider stressing this more explicitly to ensure the patient understands the importance of monitoring. |
Interpersonal Skills | Use simple, non-medical language to explain the condition and results | 02:59-03:48 | Yes | Your explanation of Barrett’s esophagus was clear and simple, avoiding unnecessary jargon. Great work! |
Interpersonal Skills | Show empathy for the patient’s symptoms and concerns | 02:02-02:26 | Partial | While you acknowledged the patient’s difficulties, opportunities to validate their feelings further (e.g., during their concerns about endoscopy discomfort) were missed. Empathy can be shown not just through words but tone and non-verbal cues. |
Interpersonal Skills | Encourage the patient to adopt healthier lifestyle choices | 06:48-07:02 | Partial | You touched upon dietary changes but didn’t strongly encourage or explore strategies for implementation. You could have provided more practical suggestions or set goals with the patient. |
Interpersonal Skills | Allow the patient to ask questions and express concerns | Throughout | Yes | You gave the patient ample opportunities to share their thoughts and ask questions, which fostered a patient-centered dialogue. Well done! |
Interpersonal Skills | Reassure the patient about the manageable nature of their condition | 03:48-04:35 | Partial | While you reassured them about the absence of cancer, you didn’t fully address their anxiety about the potential progression of Barrett’s esophagus. Providing specific statistics or emphasizing the effectiveness of monitoring could enhance reassurance. |
Interpersonal Skills | Respect the patient’s choices and decisions | 05:11-05:34 | Yes | You respected their reluctance about endoscopy and suggested working with the surgical team to find alternatives. This demonstrated respect for their preferences. |
Additional Remarks for Each Domain:
Data Gathering:You managed to build rapport and cover most critical points well. However, to improve, ensure you explore all lifestyle factors and screen for red-flag symptoms like dysphagia or weight loss. Try to incorporate signposting when moving between topics—it’ll help structure your approach better.
Management:You explained the medical details clearly and aligned your advice with the patient's needs. However, consider offering additional resources like leaflets and elaborating on safety netting. These steps will strengthen your educational impact and reinforce understanding.
Interpersonal Skills:Your language was clear and accessible, but moments of missed empathy reduced the impact. Always validate the patient's emotions, especially when they express fear or discomfort. It’s OK to pause and emphasize that their feelings are understood before moving forward.
Feedback Statement Checklist
Area to Work On | Checked | Remarks |
Consultation | ☑ | Focus on logical, structured questioning, ensuring all key areas (e.g., red flags) are covered systematically. |
Issues | ☑ | Ensure all key aspects of the condition (e.g., lifestyle changes, compliance) are explored in detail. |
Time | ☑ | Improved time allocation would allow for more thorough exploration of omitted areas like red flags and compliance. |
Listening | ☑ | Show more active listening by addressing all cues given by the patient, such as their discomfort with endoscopies. |
Language | ☑ | Ensure clarity in all parts of the consultation, avoiding any remaining traces of jargon and checking understanding more explicitly. |
Comments